Category: Engineering

Young colleagues cooperating while working on a computer in the office.

How to Set Up a Distributed Workforce

Distributed Workforce

The organizations that succeed will be the ones that build it with intentionality

Distributed Workforce

For fast-growing and cost-conscious companies

Simply repackaging old habits into digital formats won’t cut it. The future belongs to those willing to rethink everything, from meeting structures to performance metrics, with clarity and purpose.

How to Set Up a Distributed Workforce:

Embracing Intentional Design

 

The world of work has undergone a seismic shift, with distributed workforces becoming the new norm. But simply scattering teams across locations isn’t enough—success hinges on intentional design. Here’s how organizations can thoughtfully set up a distributed workforce for long-term productivity and engagement.

Agile software development approach

Start With Purposeful Planning

Intentional design begins with a clear understanding of why you’re going distributed. Is it for access to global talent, cost savings, or employee flexibility? Define your goals up front to guide every decision that follows.

Design Communication Flows, Not Just Tools

Distributed work thrives on seamless communication. Instead of relying solely on digital tools, map out how information should flow within your organization. Identify key communication channels, establish norms for meetings, and ensure transparency in decision-making. Planning information flow from the start prevents miscommunication, duplicate work, and project delays.

Kanban software development approach
Scaled Agile Framework

Build Trust and Flexibility Into the Culture

A distributed workforce requires a shift in the workplace contract. Trust, flexibility, and choice become foundational (autonomy). Empower employees to manage their own schedules and locations, while providing the digital infrastructure they need to stay connected and productive.

Rethink Collaboration Spaces

Physical offices are no longer the default. Instead, design a blend of digital and occasional physical spaces that support collaboration, creativity, and social connection. Mixed reality and other collaborative technologies can help bridge the gap between remote and in-person teams, fostering a sense of presence and shared purpose.

Lean Software Development approach
Extreme Programming (XP) software development approach

Prioritize Employee Wellbeing and Belonging

Intentional design means considering the holistic experience of distributed employees. Create opportunities for informal interaction, mentorship, and professional growth. Regularly check in on well-being and ensure every team member feels included, regardless of location.

Continuously Iterate and Improve

The distributed workforce landscape is dynamic. Gather feedback, measure outcomes, and be ready to adapt your design as needs evolve. Treat your distributed work strategy as a living system, always open to improvement.

Nearshore Specialized Tech Teams aqnd Business Requirement Analysis

Transform The Work Environment

Transforming the future will require a reinvention of how, where, and when we work – a new workplace model, Motivation 3.0, as well as a new workplace contract between employer and employee. Employers must ensure trust, flexibility, and choice, as well as the highest quality experience.

In Summary

Setting up a distributed workforce isn’t just about technology or policy—it’s about intentional intrinsic design. By planning communication, building trust (autonomy), rethinking collaboration, and prioritizing well-being, organizations can unlock the full potential of distributed teams and shape the future of work.

Let's talk

Professional Advice: When considering a nearshore outsourcing partner, always ask for examples of past projects that demonstrate their commitment to software quality. Talk with their current customers, and ask for use cases similar to your company’s competitive landscape, all that can give you the confidence you need to make the right decision for your business.

Methodology: Choose the Right Software Development Approach for Your Organization

Methodology Matters:

Choose the Right Software Development Approach for Your Organization

software development methodologies

Software Development Approaches

Welcome to our comprehensive exploration of software development methodologies for technical leaders and practitioners. This guide examines established approaches that organizations employ to structure their development processes, with evidence-based examples from industry implementations. We’ll analyze the strengths and limitations of each methodology to help you determine which framework might best align with your organizational requirements and team dynamics.

Agile Methodologies

Agile methodologies represent an adaptive approach to software development that emphasizes flexibility, customer collaboration, and rapid delivery of functional software. Born from the Agile Manifesto in 2001, these methodologies emerged as a response to the limitations of traditional development approaches.

Agile software development approach

Scrum

  • Iterative approach with 2-4 week sprints
  • Key roles: Product Owner, Scrum Master, Development Team
  • Ceremonies: Sprint Planning, Daily Standups, Sprint Review, Sprint Retrospective
  • Artifacts: Product Backlog, Sprint Backlog, Increment
  • Example: Spotify uses a modified Scrum approach with “squads” (Scrum teams) organized into “tribes” for product development, allowing them to quickly iterate on features and respond to user feedback for their streaming platform.
  • Source: Kniberg, H., & Ivarsson, A. (2012). Scaling Agile @ Spotify with Tribes, Squads, Chapters & Guilds. Spotify Engineering Blog.

Kanban

  • Continuous delivery focused on flow of work
  • Visualizes workflow on Kanban board with columns (To Do, In Progress, Done)
  • Limits work in progress (WIP) to prevent bottlenecks
  • Continuous improvement without fixed iterations
  • Example: Microsoft’s Azure DevOps team uses Kanban to manage their service updates and bug fixes, allowing them to respond to critical issues immediately while maintaining a steady flow of feature development.
  • Source: Banfield, R., Lombardo, C. T., & Wax, T. (2015). Design Sprint: A Practical Guidebook for Building Great Digital Products. O’Reilly Media.
Kanban software development approach
Extreme Programming (XP) software development approach

Extreme Programming (XP

  • Focus on technical excellence and quality
  • Practices: Pair programming, Test-Driven Development, Continuous Integration
  • Short development cycles with frequent releases
  • Emphasizes customer involvement and feedback
  • Example: Pivotal Labs implements XP practices like pair programming and TDD for client projects, which has helped them maintain high code quality while developing complex applications for companies like Twitter in their early days.
  • Source: Beck, K., & Andres, C. (2004). Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change (2nd Edition). Addison-Wesley Professional.

Lean Software Development

  • Derived from Toyota Production System
  • Principles: Eliminate waste, amplify learning, decide late, deliver fast
  • Focus on creating value and reducing non-value activities
  • Uses value stream mapping to identify inefficiencies
  • Example: Intuit (maker of TurboTax and QuickBooks) applies Lean principles to eliminate waste in their development process, enabling them to deliver faster updates while maintaining quality through techniques like A/B testing and customer feedback loops.
  • Source: Poppendieck, M., & Poppendieck, T. (2003). Lean Software Development: An Agile Toolkit. Addison-Wesley Professional.
Lean Software Development approach

Traditional Methodologies

Traditional methodologies originated in manufacturing and engineering industries, where structured, sequential processes were essential for efficiency and quality control. The Waterfall model, one of the earliest formalized approaches, was introduced in 1970 by Dr. Winston W. Royce as a way to manage software development with clear, linear phases like planning, design, implementation, testing, and maintenance. These methods emphasize predictability, documentation, and rigorous upfront planning, making them ideal for projects with stable requirements. 🏗️📊

Waterfall software development approach

Waterfall

  • Sequential, linear approach
  • Distinct phases: Requirements, Design, Implementation, Verification, Maintenance
  • Each phase must be completed before moving to the next
  • More suitable for projects with well-defined requirements
  • Example: NASA used Waterfall methodology for the Space Shuttle software development, where requirements were extremely well-defined and changes during development could have catastrophic consequences. The approach led to incredibly reliable software with a defect rate of less than 0.1 errors per 1,000 lines of code.
  • Source: Fishman, C. (1996). They Write the Right Stuff. Fast Company Magazine, Issue 6.

Spiral Mode

  • Combines iterative development with systematic aspects of waterfall
  • Four phases: Planning, Risk Analysis, Engineering, Evaluation
  • Risk-driven approach that emphasizes risk assessment
  • Suitable for large, complex systems
  • Example: The Windows operating system development at Microsoft has historically used aspects of the Spiral model, particularly in earlier versions, allowing them to address risks early while developing a complex software system through multiple iterations.
  • Source: Boehm, B. W. (1988). A Spiral Model of Software Development and Enhancement. IEEE Computer, 21(5), 61-72.
Spiral Model software development approach
V-Model software development approach

V-Model

  • Extension of waterfall with corresponding testing phase for each development stage
  • Emphasizes verification and validation activities
  • Testing is planned in parallel with development activities
  • Higher success rate than traditional waterfall
  • Example: Siemens uses the V-Model for medical device software development, where validation and verification are crucial for regulatory compliance and patient safety. Each design phase has a corresponding testing phase to ensure requirements are met.
  • Source: International Medical Device Regulators Forum. (2015). Software as a Medical Device (SaMD): Clinical Evaluation. IMDRF/SaMD WG/N41FINAL:2015.

Scaling Frameworks

Scaling frameworks originated from the need to extend Agile methodologies beyond small teams to large enterprises. As Agile gained popularity in the early 2000s, organizations faced challenges in coordinating multiple teams while maintaining agility. Frameworks like SAFe (Scaled Agile Framework), LeSS (Large-Scale Scrum), and Spotify’s Model emerged to provide structured approaches for scaling Agile across departments and business units, ensuring alignment, collaboration, and efficiency at scale. 🚀📈

Scaled Agile Framework

SAFe (Scaled Agile Framework)

  • Framework for implementing agile practices at enterprise scale
  • Multiple configurations: Essential, Large Solution, Portfolio, Full
  • Organizes work in Agile Release Trains (ARTs)
  • Includes concepts like Program Increment (PI) Planning
  • Example: Cisco implemented SAFe to coordinate work across 800+ teams worldwide. They organize quarterly Program Increment planning sessions where teams align on priorities and dependencies, resulting in faster time-to-market for their networking products.
  • Source: Scaled Agile, Inc. (2019). Cisco Case Study. Scaled Agile Framework.

LeSS (Large-Scale Scrum)

  • Framework for scaling Scrum to multiple teams
  • Two variations: LeSS (2-8 teams) and LeSS Huge (8+ teams)
  • Single Product Owner, multiple teams working on same Product Backlog
  • Emphasizes feature teams over component teams
  • Example: J.P. Morgan Chase adopted LeSS for their trading systems development, enabling multiple teams to work on the same product backlog while maintaining a coherent architecture and reducing coordination overhead.
  • Source: Larman, C., & Vodde, B. (2016). Large-Scale Scrum: More with LeSS. Addison-Wesley Professional.
Large-Scale Scrum
Nexus software development approach

Nexus

  • Developed by Scrum.org for scaling Scrum
  • Integration team coordinates 3-9 Scrum teams
  • Introduces Nexus Sprint Planning, Nexus Daily Scrum, Nexus Sprint Review
  • Focuses on integration challenges across teams
  • Example: Schlumberger, an oil and gas technology company, has used Nexus to coordinate the development of their digital platform across multiple Scrum teams, with a Nexus Integration Team ensuring that integration issues are identified and resolved quickly.
  • Source: Schwaber, K. (2015). Nexus Guide: The Definitive Guide to Scaling Scrum with Nexus. Scrum.org.

Disciplined Agile (DA)

  • Hybrid approach that combines elements from multiple methodologies
  • Context-driven, not prescriptive
  • Organized around process goals rather than specific practices
  • Allows teams to choose their way of working
  • Example: IBM has implemented Disciplined Agile across various business units, allowing teams to tailor their processes based on their specific context while maintaining enterprise governance. This flexibility helped them during their large-scale digital transformation.
  • Source: Ambler, S. W., & Lines, M. (2020). Choose Your WoW!: A Disciplined Agile Delivery Handbook for Optimizing Your Way of Working. Project Management Institute.
Disciplined Agile software development approach

Development Frameworks and Approaches

Development frameworks and approaches like DevOps, DevSecOps, FDD (Feature-Driven Development), and BDD (Behavior-Driven Development) emerged to improve software delivery speed, collaboration, and quality. Each approach was developed to address specific challenges in software development, security, and collaboration, shaping modern engineering practices. 🚀

DevOps approach software development

DevOps

  • Cultural and technical practice that unifies development and operations
  • Key practices: CI/CD, infrastructure as code, monitoring, automation
  • Focus on shorter development cycles and reliable delivery
  • Tools ecosystem includes Git, Jenkins, Docker, Kubernetes
  • Example: Netflix has built a sophisticated DevOps culture that enables them to deploy thousands of changes to production daily. Their Chaos Monkey tool deliberately introduces failures to test system resilience, ensuring their streaming service remains reliable despite constant updates.
  • Source: Humble, J., & Farley, D. (2010). Continuous Delivery: Reliable Software Releases through Build, Test, and Deployment Automation. Addison-Wesley Professional.

DevSecOps

  • Integrates security practices into DevOps process
  • “Shift left” approach to security testing
  • Automated security validation and compliance
  • Security as a shared responsibility
  • Example: Capital One implemented DevSecOps practices to integrate security into their development pipeline, using automated security scanning tools that run with each code commit. This approach helped them identify and address vulnerabilities earlier, reducing security incidents while maintaining rapid deployment.
  • Source: Myrbakken, H., & Colomo-Palacios, R. (2017). DevSecOps: A Multivocal Literature Review. In Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination (pp. 17-29). Springer.
DevSecOps security practices
Feature-Driven Development

Feature-Driven Development (FDD)

  • Model-driven, short-iteration process
  • Five main activities: Develop overall model, build feature list, plan by feature, design by feature, build by feature
  • Feature teams organized around feature sets
  • Regular builds and progress tracking
  • Example: Danske Bank used FDD to develop their mobile banking application, organizing work around customer-centric features. This approach helped them prioritize features that delivered the most value to customers while maintaining a consistent domain model.
  • Source: Palmer, S. R., & Felsing, J. M. (2002). A Practical Guide to Feature-Driven Development. Prentice Hall.

Behavior-Driven Development (BDD)

  • Extension of Test-Driven Development
  • Uses natural language constructs to express behaviors and expected outcomes
  • Bridges communication gap between technical and non-technical stakeholders
  • Tools like Cucumber, SpecFlow implement Gherkin syntax for specifications
  • Example: The Guardian newspaper uses BDD for their website development, with product owners writing acceptance criteria in Gherkin syntax (Given-When-Then format). This approach has improved communication between business and technical teams, ensuring that developers build exactly what the business needs.
  • Source: North, D. (2006). Introducing BDD. Better Software Magazine.
Behavior-Driven Development

Process-Oriented Methodologies

Process-Oriented Methodologies, like Personal Software Process (PSP) and Team Software Process (TSP), were developed by Watts Humphrey at Carnegie Mellon University to improve software quality and team productivity. 🚀📊

PSP Personal Software Process

PSP (Personal Software Process)

  • Developed by Watts Humphrey at the Software Engineering Institute (SEI)
  • Structured framework for individual developers to improve personal productivity and code quality
  • Emphasizes data collection, measurement, and continuous improvement
  • Progressive learning path with increasing levels of sophistication (PSP0 to PSP3)
  • Key components: Time tracking, defect logging, size and effort estimation, code reviews, quality management
  • Example: Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) implemented PSP training for their developers, resulting in significant quality improvements. Engineers who adopted PSP practices reduced defect rates by over 75% and improved estimation accuracy. The structured approach to tracking time, defects, and size helped individual developers better understand their performance and systematically improve their work.
  • Source: Humphrey, W. S. (2005). PSP: A Self-Improvement Process for Software Engineers. Addison-Wesley Professional.

TSP (Team Software Process)

  • Extension of PSP principles to the team level
  • Provides a framework for building and managing high-performance software teams
  • Emphasizes self-directed teams with defined roles and responsibilities
  • Includes detailed launch process and regular checkpoints
  • Key components: Team launch and role assignment, detailed planning, quality management system, risk management, weekly team meetings
  • Example: Microsoft’s Windows Embedded team adopted TSP for firmware development, resulting in a 40% reduction in system test defects and improved schedule predictability. The team used TSP’s structured launch process to establish clear roles and create detailed plans. The emphasis on quality management through inspections and peer reviews helped catch defects early in the development process, significantly reducing testing and maintenance costs.
  • Source: Humphrey, W. S. (2006). TSP: Leading a Development Team. Addison-Wesley Professional.
TSP Team Software Process
Combined PSP/TSP Implementation

Combined PSP/TSP Implementation

  • Example: Adobe Systems implemented both PSP and TSP for their Photoshop development, achieving near zero-defect releases. Developers first learned to track their own work through PSP, then formed TSP teams with clear roles. The structured approach to planning, estimation, and quality management helped them deliver complex features with significantly fewer defects and more predictable schedules compared to their previous development process.
  • Source: Wall, D. S., McHale, J., & Pomeroy-Huff, M. (2005). Case Study: Accelerating Process Improvement by Integrating the TSP and CMMI. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.

Finding Your Right Approach

Let’s be real – there’s no magical one-size-fits-all solution when it comes to software development methodologies. What works brilliantly for a Silicon Valley startup might fall flat in a highly regulated financial institution. The “best” methodology depends on a complex interplay of factors: your company culture, team size and distribution, technical stack, regulatory requirements, and even the personalities of your team members.

Some organizations thrive with the structure and predictability of traditional approaches, while others flourish with the adaptability of agile methods. Many successful companies are embracing hybrid approaches, cherry-picking the most valuable practices from different methodologies to create something uniquely tailored to their needs.

Software development methodologies

The Bottom Line

The most important thing is to be intentional about your process and willing to adapt as you learn. Remember, methodologies are tools to serve your goals, not rigid dogmas to follow blindly. Your development process should evolve as your organization grows and your needs change.

Want to figure out which approach might work best for your unique situation? Let’s chat! We’d love to discuss your current state, assess your process maturity, and help you chart a path forward that aligns with your software development goals and business ambitions. Whether you’re looking to speed up delivery, improve quality, enhance team collaboration, or all of the above – we’ve got insights and experience to share. Drop us a line, and let’s start the conversation about transforming your software development journey!

Professional Advice: When considering a nearshore outsourcing partner, always ask for examples of past projects that demonstrate their commitment to software quality. Talk with their current customers, and ask for use cases similar to your company’s competitive landscape, all that can give you the confidence you need to make the right decision for your business.

Build a Self-Managed Tech Team

You can build a technology and innovation self-managed team to boost your organization.

 

What is a high-performing team in software engineering?

 

There are different several ways to define performance.

One way that makes a big difference is how much the team is dependent on its leader. When the leader makes all the decisions, it limits the team’s potential.

You can measure the effectiveness of leaders when they leave either for a short time or permanently. If team performance declines, it’s a sign that the leader didn’t create the conditions for the team to manage themselves.

Why do self-managed teams need a leader?

You can see the top-performing teams in the world, like sports teams, for example.

  • What do they do?
  • What are the conditions?
  • What behaviors do they demonstrate?

Is the coach on the field during the game to make all the decisions? No, coaches do most of their work before and after the game. They give feedback, share insight, give advice, and prepare their players for the next game.

Inexperienced managers often have a desire to make all decisions, even those on the front lines. They get impatient, and take most of the decisions rather than see them learn from doing or coaching them to improve.

The role of leaders is to get the best performance out of the team.

And to make the vision and goals clear for all.

Build Tech Teams from Mexico
What is a self-managed team?

How a team makes decisions? Is the leader approving or making every decision? The role of the leader is to make employees think for themselves.

In a self-managed team, even the most junior employee is empowered to make a meaningful decision that affects the team’s performance.

When working with your team always ask these questions:

  • Is the company/project vision clear?
  • Are the company/project goals clear?
  • Do you understand what we’re trying to accomplish and objectives?

Everybody has to think of these answers to be a winning team.

Set the common ground and start coaching from there.

In software, teams are very common an engineer comes to you and asks, “What should I do? How should this work? Is this the correct way to do it?” You can respond by asking back, “What’s the goal we’re trying to accomplish? Which direction do you think would serve the vision and our goals better?”

Managers often decide for the person because it’s faster. Then the same engineer goes and does what the boss suggested without taking the time to think why?

It is a far better option to make the engineers think through the vision, the goals, and the trade-offs. Once they’ve done it, they can tell what options are better and why.

The coach has to point out potential flaws in their reasoning. Maybe they made an inaccurate assumption, other data, or a different approach.

Managers must teach engineers how to think about complex matters.

Engineers should consider the vision, the goals, and the data, so they can decide on doing some analysis.
When your engineers do this, you can coach them to solve complex problems, instead of solving for them. At that point, a team member can grow.

How to develop a self-managed team?

Every challenge is a learning opportunity; don’t take them away from the team. Ideally, they should be making most of the front-line decisions.

But even after deciding for your team, you can sit down with them and explain the reasoning behind the decision.

It’s worth investing time into because if everybody on the team thinks and analyzes by themselves, they all can move faster.

How do you measure the performance of management?

A manager being overloaded with work may be a warning sign. Managers should delegate more responsibility to their team and let them own it autonomously.

Strategies for leaders to build self-managed teams

 

1. How often do engineers ask the leader to make decisions

 

Watch for these types of questioning:

  • Can I do this?
  • Should I do this?
  • Am I allowed to do this?
  • Do you approve this?

2. Do more coaching

Don’t make decisions for them, unless you have to. Instead try, when they come with questions, ask back, “What would you do in my place?” make them think through the problem. Or try explaining, that you want them to think for themselves, analyze and take decisions, to become a more complete professional.

 

3. Encourage the team to make decisions

 

Growth happens when somebody gives you an opportunity and trusts you to make it happen. You need space and support to deliver a goal.

A good manager can get results. A great manager can get results and grow their people, so they can do the same for others. Most people are open to and grateful for these opportunities. They see this helps them to grow.

Build Tech Teams from Mexico
Communicate purpose to become a self-managed team

Set a clear expectation for them to think for themselves and to make decisions. Ask them to think about it and make a proposal.

Always clarify the vision and the goals first.

Leaders are not the right people to make frontline decisions. They must help the individual collaborators to make the right decisions.

Help them make decisions, and coach the thinking process and reasoning.

Requisites to become a self-managed team

 

Be patient, building technical self-managed teams takes time. Managers need to observe each team member’s thinking process and select if they are fit to be self-managed.

Some people are not comfortable making decisions. They might be slowing the performance of the overall team.

Take the time to evaluate your team and make sure they’re capable before you expect them to work autonomously. You may have to replace some people, but building a team of leaders empowered to make good decisions makes a lot of difference.

The mindset of critical thinking and growth is required.

Whether it’s possible to turn your team into a self-managed team, depends mostly on the team members.

What should I do now?

 

If you are interested in hiring a self-managed tech team from Mexico, contact us for a free consultation.

Our engineers have deep knowledge of web development and cloud, with many success stories building e-commerce, marketplaces, mobile apps, fintech, payments, banking, and retail.

 

Learn Why Towa Managed Teams is the right fit for your company, book a 15-min call with us now.

Onshore or Nearshore Tech Teams

So we all know about Offshore software development teams, they can be found abroad, usually foreign countries on the other side of the world.

 

Current technology enable collaboration of teams, everyone works remotely now so it is easier to outsource skills and engineers to help you build your product or service faster, at lesser cost than building a tech team locally.

Mexico, Colombia, Argentina, Chile all have cities with technology hubs where your company can find the right skills and engineering techniques for your project.

Many companies and startups find that outsourcing software development offers more benefits than hiring developers in-house or locally, mainly because today’s most demanded skills are related to computer sciences and there are certain IT skills that are hard to find, so the costs rise up, and there are no guarantees.

 

When researching a place to outsource, there are basically four types of IT outsourcing to consider: locally, onshore, nearshore or offshore?

 

So, which is the best option for outsourcing tech teams for your business?

Hiring locally, Onshore, Nearshore, etc?

There are pros and cons to all of them. So it’s important to define what are the main differences between them. To determine which options of IT outsourcing is the best for your company.

 

  • Onshore or nearshore means that outsourcing software development is located in the same countryor region and have similar and compatible timezones.
  • Offshore indicates that the company you hired is in another country with a different time zone, maybe 12 hours.
  • Hiring locally can be expensive, and some skills required are hard to find.

The awesome about today’s technology is that. There is no need for an in-house team. Instead, you can find the right partner to help you build and scale a tech team, both onshore or nearshore, outsource in a neighborhood country.

Onshore Tech Teams

 

Onshore is often known as local outsourcing. In this option of software development service, a company has the opportunity to focus on its core business capabilities.

 

While quality is ensured, the required work is still done in a connected manner, with regular or daily meetings.

 

Your dedicated team will speak the same language. Onshore and nearshore outsourcing offers some benefits:

 

  • No language barriers or many cultural similarities.
  • Timezones are the same, or have many compatible 9 am to 5 pm labor hours.
  • Constant communication, daily meetings and same day responses.
  • An onshore development team is easy to nail and scale.
  • Less expensive labor than locally
Top Mexican Engineers for Hire
Nearshore Tech Teams

Nearshore software development is consider to be between onshore and offshore.

 

Nearshoring is when the team is located close to your company headquarters, perhaps in a neighbor country (Canada or Mexico)

 

Nearshore outsourcing has similar benefits to onshore and is far better option than what offshore can offer.

 

Weather you choose a nearshore or onshore partner company to build your tech team, the pool of talent is exponentially larger and labor costs can be reduced.

 

In addition, there are other advantages for nearshore tech teams:

  • Time zone are mostly the same or lightly different.
  • Many Latam countries share cultural or lenguaje similairies.
  • Being more able to travel, if you really need to.

 

Most of the time. it would probably be a little higher cost than offshoring your tech team, but it is many times less riskier and more likely to success when you hire a manage tech team in a neighbor country like Mexico.

Onshore Tech Team: What you need to know?

 

Onshore tech teams are located in Mexico, in cities with the top talent coming from best Universities in the country.

An Onshore tech team can maximize a successful business with quality, engineering and technology at a lower cost.

From Onshoring a Tech Team, both parties benefit from the partnership.

 

Advantages of Onshoring a Tech Team

 

Some potential benefits of an offshore software development team:

 

  • The project accesses a larger pool of talent
  • Hiring a top talent for you team at lower costs
  • Dedicated Tech teams can handle your technology services
  • If you find the right partner to build your Tech Team for your company, they can assure to deliver and meet deadlines
Disadvantages of Onshore a Tech Team

 

There are some risks if you outsource your technology. While planning to hire a dedicated team, you need to consider the following:

 

  • Watch for similar time-zone , the less difference the better.
  • Transfering too much critical activity too fast.
  • Analyize the working culture of the neighbor country
  • Find partners that is located in a 3 to 4 hour flight to visit the production team, even that now almost everyone works remotely from homeoffice.
  • See for cultural values like accountability, hierarchy, scheduling, responsibility.

 

Talk to us to evaluate our company skills to help your business build a successful technology core competency.

As a leading software development in United States and Mexico, we have huge experiences in many fields including e-commerce, marketplace platform, fintech, payments, banking, retail and many more.

 

You can contact us at support@towasoftware.com or via +1 (210) 787 4525 for more information.

 

Don’t hesitate to contact us.

React Native: Building Mobile Products (MVP)

React Native for Building Great Cross Platform Products

 

W

hat is React Native?

 

React Native is a Javascript framework that was built by Facebook and re-licensed for use by third parties in 2017. It allows developers to create apps for both iOS and Android web stores using a single codebase and a single programming language. With React Native, developers have the ability to write one React code that compiles to native applications on both iOS and Android, rather than having to construct parallel codebases in multiple programming languages.

What are the Benefits to React Native Development?

Time and Cost Savings

Prior to the release of React Native a company was required to either find engineers that had experience with both iOS Android programming languages, or to hire separate developers to work on each platform individually.

 

In contrast, React Native allows you to have a single team of developers experienced in one primary programming language who can work on both platforms simultaneously in one single codebase. Depending on the functionalities of your app, at least 90% of the codebase can be shared across both platforms and since all the versions of your software are written in mostly the same code, updating and adding features becomes much faster and easier.

 

Though there are some differences between iOS and Android that need to be accounted for when using React Native, the time and cost savings of having one codebase are a huge benefit.

Open Source Libraries and the React Community

When using React Native you are taking advantage of the wider open source community and ecosystem that exists around React and Javascript.; A tremendous number of libraries exist that can be used for common mobile application features, meaning you won’t have to spend so much time writing code to add extra features to your app- it’s likely that that functionality has already been built and shared with the community.

 

Additionally, the number of engineers employed by Facebook, as well as a big open source community means a continued improvement in the platform over time.

Shared Web App Code

If your mobile app also calls for a web browser/desktop application, React Native can provide some reuse and sharing of code between those platforms. Because React Native is just React and JavaScript code, an experienced development team could get a head start on a web application.

 

Additionally, Electrode Native is an open source tool that will allow you to migrate existing React apps to React Native.

Who Uses React Native?

Because it’s such a reliable and powerful cross platform development tool, React Native is being used by many top companies to develop their mobile apps.

 

Facebook uses React Native for their social media site as well as for Facebook ads manager and Facebook analytics. Instagram was able to share around 85% of code between its Android and iOS apps by using React Native, allowing their team to deliver the app much more quickly than would have been possible using a Native solution. And Tesla’s app, an integral part of its user interface that enables users to remotely monitor and control their Tesla car or Powerwall from their iPhone or Android, was developed using React Native.

 

With React Native, developing and supporting apps for both iOS and Android is less effort it once was. From the ability to develop apps across platforms using one codebase to the benefits of utilizing the open source community, React Native provides an optimal framework for developing awesome cross platform products.

 

Team building: Empowering your mindset

Recently we had given a mindset workshop to a group of engineers who were participating in Engineering Warriors Training® (EWT). We constantly seek to strengthen our training process, where learning is not only technical, but we also aim to provide tools that enrich the engineer’s personal and professional life.

 

We found in the book “Mindset, The New Psychology of Success” of Carol Dweck PhD, that by cultivating a growth mindset the person becomes more open to learn through new experiences; instead of being intimidated by a new situation or something that may be considered difficult, the engineers (people like you and me) will feel attracted and interested, so that they are willing to try harder than they would normally do to overcome the challenge.

 

People with this type of mindset are excited when they face a problem or something unknown; this is seen not even as something negative but as an opportunity to grow and learn. They have greater resilience and therefore greater perseverance.

 

We may think that someone that has born with this mindset has a great advantage over others; however, in Carol’s proposal she shares that mindset is something that can be trained, just as you train your body for a marathon or for any sport.

 

The “growth mindset” is a choice on how to see the challenges that arise in your life: you can see them as big stones that stop your progress, or as learning bridges through which you will have to stretch your capacity and once reaching the other side you will be stronger and bigger than before.

 

A strategy to cultivate the “Growth mindset” is known as “The power of yet”, this is the power of believing that you can improve. Just by putting the word “YET” before any of your thoughts about your ability to solve something, this way you will open the possibilities for yourself, accepting that you are in a process of growth and learning, from which you will come out bigger than how you began.

 

Small changes that we make in the way we see professional and life challenges, will open us up to greater possibilities and better results.

java-development

What are you yet to resolve (become)?

+ Towa Positive